Kant's Critique of the Power of Judgment: Critical Essays (Critical Essays on the Classics Series)
Format: PDF / Kindle (mobi) / ePub
Kant's Critique of the Power of Judgment, first published in 1790, was the last of the great philosopher's three critiques, following on the heels of Critique of Pure Reason (1781) and Critique of Practical Reason (1788). In the first two, Kant dealt with metaphysics and morality; in the third, Kant turns to the aesthetic dimension of human experience, showing how our experiences of natural and artistic beauty, the sublime magnitude and might of nature, and of purposive organisms and ecological systems gives us palpable evidece that it is possible for us not only to form moral intentions, but also to realize our freely chosen moral goals within nature as we experience it. The present volume collects twelve of the most important critical discussions on the Critique of the Power of Judgment written by leading Kant scholars and aestheticians from the United States and Great Britain. In addition to a substantive introduction by the editor, the book includes an extensive, annotated bibliography of the most important work on Kant and on the background and arguments of his third Critique published throughout the twentieth century.
philosophy and its new a priori principle completed, "though not in print," by the following Easter, to be "entitled 'The Critique of Taste.'?" As usual, Kant was overly optimistic, and the third Critique was not finished and published until the spring of 1790, rather than of 1788. In addition, when it was published, it was not entitled the Critique of Taste, but rather the Critique of the Power of Judgment, and it comprised two main parts: the "Critique of the Aesthetic Power of Judgment" and
and deduction of aesthetic judgment is shot through with the complex interplay between contingency and necessity that is characteristic of his conception of reflecting judgment. A summary of some key points in Kant's aesthetics can substantiate this claim. First, contingency in the fulfillment of a necessary goal is the essence of Kant's explanation of pleasure in beauty itself. The basic premises of Kant's theory of aesthetic response are laid down in section VI of the introduction to the third
concepts of natural science that provide the fundamental structure to our experience. Kant means two things by purposiveness: first, that an object is suitable for the realization of some purpose of our own, which he calls "subjective purposiveness"; second, that an object appears to have been created to satisfy some purpose, whether a purpose of our own or of its creator, which could be called "objective" in contrast to "subjective" purposiveness. His claim in the third Critique then, is that
a concept, namely that of being nourishing, rendering the judgment of taste unacceptably cognitive and non-aesthetic (cf. § 1.1). The reply to this must be that when Kant sets aside cognitive matters as non-aesthetic, thus as not elucidatory of the beautiful, the sort of thing he has it in mind to exclude is information about the object as it is on its own account. (The phrase "keine Beschaffenheit des Objekts, fiir sich betrachtet" glossing 92 Anthony Savile "not a cognitive judgment," "kein
written about Kant's teleology than about his aesthetics. But recent work has begun to make it clear that this part of Kant's book should not be ignored, for it is precisely here that he provides his most extended reflection on the unity of our conceptions of the natural world and our own moral vocation. He also provides here his clearest account of how we are to understand his theory of the postulates of pure practical reason, above all the idea of God as the common author of the laws of nature